Compares bootstrap methods with maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches to assess parameter risk.
When building statistical models to help estimate future results, actuaries need to be aware that not only is there uncertainty inherent in random events (process risk), there is also uncertainty inherent in using a finite sample to parameterize the models (parameter risk). This paper revisits [@R24] in replicating its bootstrap method and compares it with measures of parameter uncertainty developed using maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian MCMC analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avraham Adler (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: