In vitro analysis shows ketamine reduces cell growth and increases apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells, suggesting therapeutic potential.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and remains a major health concern due to its high recurrence and mortality rates. Recent studies suggest that anesthetic agents, including ketamine, may have direct effects on cancer cell viability and apoptosis. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the in vitro effects of ketamine on the HT-29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, focusing on its cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic potential. Material and Methods: HT-29 cells were treated with ketamine for 24 h. Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay. Apoptosis rates were determined by flow cytometry with Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD staining. Furthermore, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to assess the expression levels of key genes associated with proliferation and apoptosis. GeneQuery™ Human Basal Cell Carcinoma qPCR Array Kit (GQH-BCC-GK015-C) was used for qPCR analysıs. Molecular docking simulations were performed to investigate the potential molecular interactions between ketamine and three target proteins: the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and casein kinase 1 delta (CSNK1D). To ensure robustness of predictions, two independent docking methods were employed. Results: Ketamine significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC50 value of approximately 1.05 µM. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated a marked increase in early apoptosis (23.9%) in treated cells. These findings suggest that ketamine exhibits potential anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on HT-29 colorectal cancer cells. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ketamine exhibits potential anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on HT-29 colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and potential clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korkmaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: