PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Aesthetic Surgery Journal2 citationsOpen Access

A Comparative Immunological Assessment of the Capsules From Silicone Implants With 0-µm and 4-µm Surfaces

View Full Paper
NCNathan R. ChanTLTaylor M. LeveeSWSally M. Winkler

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare immune responses to silicone implants with smooth versus rough surfaces.
  • Miniaturized implants or coupons of silicone implants were implanted subcutaneously in mice.
  • Capsule samples were collected after 3, 6, or 9 weeks.
  • Immune cell characterization included histology, flow cytometry, and gene expression analysis.
  • Inflammation scores were similar between smooth and 4-µm implants at all timepoints.
  • Macrophage populations showed no significant differences between implant types.
  • Regulatory T cell levels in capsule tissues were comparable between both implant surfaces.

Abstract

Abstract Background The immune system drives the foreign body response (FBR) to breast implants, triggering cellular and molecular events that lead to the formation of an implant capsule. Implant surface topography may influence this immunological process. Objectives Assess the immune response to silicone implants with smooth or 4-μm surface roughness. Methods Custom-made, miniaturized implants or coupons of commercially available breast implant shells with smooth (0-μm) or 4-μm surfaces were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsolumbar region of mice. Capsule samples were harvested after 3, 6, or 9 weeks. Immune cells were characterized via histology scoring based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993-6:2016 guidelines (biological evaluation of medical devices), flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression analysis. Results Histological total sum scores, indicating overall inflammation, were similar between smooth and 4-µm implants at 3, 6, and 9 weeks postimplantation. Macrophages, key regulators of the FBR, were comparable between smooth and 4-µm implants, as demonstrated by flow cytometry analysis and CD11b+ histology staining. Further analysis of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory macrophages showed similar phenotypes between smooth and 4-µm implants. Regulatory T cell populations, which are responsible for suppressing excessive immune responses and maintaining immune balance, were similar in capsule tissues from smooth and 4-µm implants, as determined by flow cytometry and Foxp3 gene expression analysis. Gene expression of markers for cell populations and mechanotransduction were comparable at all timepoints. Conclusions Host immune responses were similar for breast implants with surface roughness of 0 µm or 4 µm up to 9 weeks postimplantation in mice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3203440886becb653f409https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper