Prospective trial examines capsular contracture rates in women receiving textured and smooth silicone implants, suggesting surface texture matters.
The aim of this prospective, controlled clinical investigation was to find out if there is a difference in the capsular contracture rate between silicone implants with a smooth or textured surface as the only difference. Twenty-five women with bilateral mammary hypoplasia underwent mammary augmentation. All got a textured implant on one side and a smooth implant on the other. The implants were placed subglandularly. Follow-up examinations were done on six occasions. Three parameters were used for estimation of the tendency to capsular contracture: (1) the patient's opinion on differences in hardness of the breasts, (2) the investigator's classification of capsular contracture, and (3) applanation tonometry. At the end of the follow-up period, after 1 year, all parameters showed with no doubt that the breasts augmented with textured implants had a lower tendency to develop contracting capsules than the breasts augmented with smooth implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakelius et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: