This research optimizes joint survival probability in reciprocal reinsurance, indicating a fair balance of interests between insurer and reinsurer.
In this paper, we study reinsurance treaties between an insurer and a reinsurer, considering both parties’ interests. Most papers only focus on the insurer’s point of view. The latest research considering both sides has considerably oversimplified the joint survival function. This situation leads to an unrealistic optimal solution; one of the parties can make risk-free profits while the other bears all the risk. Here, we define and optimize a fair joint survival probability for a reciprocal reinsurance treaty, under the expected value principle, for both quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance contracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: