Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative evaluation examines path-tracking performance in vehicles, highlighting controller effectiveness.
This study presents a comparative evaluation of path-tracking controllers designed from reduced-order state-space vehicle models. A four-state state-space model is formulated from the bicycle-model dynamics and target-path geometry, where the state variables are the previewed lateral error, heading error, side-slip angle, and yaw rate. To reduce the dependence on variables that are difficult to obtain in practice, a three-state model is derived by eliminating the explicit side-slip dynamics, and a two-state model is further obtained by replacing the yaw-rate dynamics with a kinematic approximation. Based on these three models, linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) controllers are designed. In addition, two linear quadratic static output-feedback (LQ SOF) controllers are constructed from the original four-state model by using reduced output sets. The five controllers are evaluated by vehicle simulations carried out in CarSim under front-wheel-steering and four-wheel-steering configurations. The results clarify the influence of controller structure and model order on path-tracking performance and identify the controller–actuator combination that provides the most favorable performance under the conditions considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seongjin Yim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: