Comparative analysis evaluates segmentation accuracy of multiple deep learning architectures in panoramic radiographs, suggesting optimal selections for clinical needs.
This study aimed to perform the first multi-architecture comparison of pixel-level mandibular condyle segmentation on panoramic radiographs using transformer-based (RT-DETR), CNN-based (EfficientNet, Mask R-CNN, ConvNeXt), and YOLO-based (YOLOv9-Seg, YOLOv11-Seg) deep learning models. A dataset of 1,300 panoramic radiographs (2,600 condyles) was retrospectively curated. Ground-truth masks were annotated by a primary radiologist and reviewed by a senior radiologist; inter-observer agreement was quantified on a blinded 10% subset (Dice: 0.92 ± 0.03). Six state-of-the-art architectures were trained and evaluated on a fixed test set. Performance was assessed using Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, and F1-score. All models achieved high segmentation accuracy, with DSC values ranging from 0.819 to 0.866. The transformer-based RT-DETR model showed the highest numerical DSC (0.866), IoU (0.764), and F1-score (0.866), indicating a balanced overall segmentation profile. Among the one-stage detectors, YOLOv9-Seg provided competitive results (DSC: 0.862) with high recall (0.902), outperforming CNN-based alternatives. YOLOv11-Seg showed high sensitivity but lower precision compared to other architectures. Deep learning enables accurate and automated condylar segmentation on panoramic radiographs. While RT-DETR showed favorable anatomical fidelity for quantitative morphometry, YOLOv9-Seg presented a viable real-time alternative. This study establishes a benchmark for selecting segmentation architectures tailored to specific clinical needs in TMJ analysis. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: