Evaluates deep learning models for detecting C-shaped canals in mandibular molars, suggesting effective clinical tool development.
This study aimed to develop and validate a two-stage deep-learning workflow that automatically localizes mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs and classifies C-shaped canal presence as an explainable, clinically deployable decision-support tool. A total of 1,252 panoramic radiographs (2015–2025) were retrieved from a digital archive. Stage 1 employed YOLOv8 to detect teeth #37 and #47. Stage 2 applied three CNNs (DenseNet-169, EfficientNet-B6, ConvNeXt-Base) and ensemble approaches to classify C-shaped canals on YOLO-derived crops. Data were split 70/15/15 for training/validation/testing. Detection was evaluated using IoU and mAP; classification via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC. Pairwise AUC comparisons used DeLong test with Bonferroni correction. Grad-CAM provided visual explanations. YOLOv8 achieved high localization performance, reliably supplying regions of interest to classifiers. ConvNeXt-Base demonstrated the most consistent discrimination with top-tier accuracy and F1-score. A binary EfficientNet-ConvNeXt ensemble performed comparably to the best individual model, while the tertiary ensemble showed no improvement. DeLong analysis revealed statistically significant AUC advantage of ConvNeXt-Base over DenseNet-169 for tooth #47 after correction. This two-stage pipeline enables accurate, automation-ready detection of C-shaped canals from routine panoramic radiographs, potentially informing patient triage and CBCT indication decisions. Multicenter validation is warranted before clinical deployment. This AI system offers a practical screening tool using existing panoramic radiographs to identify high-risk patients, potentially improving treatment planning efficiency, reducing unnecessary CBCT referrals, and alerting clinicians to complex anatomy before endodontic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çakmak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: