Investigates wildfires' effects on tree assemblages in old-growth and burned forests, suggesting significant ecological implications.
Wildfires represent a powerful driver of tropical forest degradation across human-modified landscapes. Here, we investigated the impacts of wildfires on the functional and taxonomic dimensions of tree assemblages into old-growth, once-burned and twice-burned forest stands, covering 6 ha in the eastern Amazon. Tree assemblages were examined via a large set of functional attributes relative to wood density, bark thickness, vertical structure, forest habitat, regeneration strategy and seed dispersal mode. Overall, wildfires are positively associated with soft-woody, pioneer, canopy and those species with seed dispersal by generalist vertebrates, while shade-tolerant individuals, particularly understory species, decline. Changes become more evident as fire events accumulate, with burned forests becoming increasingly distinct from unburned old-growth forests functionally and taxonomically. Finally, wildfire was positively correlated with increasing within-habitat species dissimilarity in the adult assemblages, but with a clear trend of decreasing dissimilarity in sapling assemblages across burned forests as fire frequency increases. Our results suggest that old-growth forests are not only vulnerable to wildfires but are greatly impacted in terms of forest physical structure as well as several community-level attributes of tree assemblages. As fire events increase in frequency, forest responses, damage or degradation intensifies, leading to forest secondarization as a collection of forest patches dominated by pioneer or successional species from the local forest flora. Damage from wildfire result from tree mortality and pioneer species recruitment during fire-induced regeneration, suggesting effects may be temporary, but this will depend on forest resilience and fire regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: