This article demonstrates credibility measures in experience rating, revealing implications for insurance plans across states.
The American Academy of Actuaries defines credibility as a measure of the predictive value that the actuary attaches to a particular set of data in a given application. In currently common notation and terminology used for workers compensation experience rating, Z p and Z e denote primary and excess credibilities. This article shows for the first time that in NCCI’s Experience Rating Plan, the weight given to the reported primary loss ratio is Z p D , where D is the insured’s average D-ratio, and the weight given to the reported excess loss ratio is Z e ( 1 – D ) . We use this viewpoint to show an underlying similarity between NCCI’s and California’s workers compensation experience rating plans, to explain recent state-level performance of NCCI’s Experience Rating Plan, and to discuss interstate mods across states with differing experience rating plans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: