As natural and anthropogenic hazards intensify, improving the performance of reinforced-concrete (RC) infrastructure within a resilience-oriented assessment framework while limiting environmental burdens has become an important challenge for sustainable construction. In this context, this study proposes an OpenBIM-based digital-twin methodology to compare two equivalent RC structural scenarios: a conventional solution and an alternative incorporating unprocessed waste sheep wool fibres into cementitious materials. Using an IFC-based model of a high-rise building, the workflow enables automated extraction of structural quantities and a consistent building-scale assessment of material use, environmental impacts, and circularity indicators. Laboratory evidence from the literature is translated into element-level performance criteria through a dual-factor selection strategy based on key structural properties and secondary indicators related to cracking and post-cracking behaviour. The results show that the wool-fibre alternative enables the incorporation of a relevant amount of waste wool into the structure while causing only negligible increases in embodied energy and carbon emissions relative to the conventional RC scenario. The selected formulations also maintain or improve the governing mechanical and serviceability-related factors, indicating potential benefits in crack control, toughness, and repairability. Overall, this methodology provides a reproducible pathway for linking laboratory-scale material innovation with building-scale digital assessment, supporting more sustainable and performance-aware decision-making in RC construction.
Ruiz-Díaz et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: