A review highlights robot capabilities in agricultural phenotyping, suggesting advancements in mobile sensing and analysis.
High-throughput plant phenotyping (HTPP) is increasingly limited by the mismatch between the need for field-relevant, fine-grained phenotypic information and the restricted capability of conventional observation platforms under complex agricultural conditions. Ground mobile robots are emerging as the key carrier for resolving this gap because they combine close-range sensing, autonomous mobility, and physical interaction within real field environments. In this paper, a structured scoping review is presented using a closed-loop perception–decision–action pipeline as the organizing principle. Within this framework, recent advances are synthesized from the perspectives of multimodal fusion, localization-aware sensing, motion planning, deep-learning-based phenotypic analysis, active observation, robotic intervention, and edge deployment. The review further clarifies the complementary roles of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs), and air–ground collaboration in multiscale phenotyping workflows. Beyond summarizing technologies, the article provides three concrete deliverables: a structured taxonomy of mobile phenotyping systems; comparative tables covering sensing modalities, localization/navigation methods, and AI models; and a research agenda linking technical progress to field deployability. The synthesis highlights four persistent bottlenecks, namely environmental generalization, annotation scarcity, limited standardization and reproducibility, and the gap between advanced models and agricultural edge hardware. Overall, ground robots are identified not merely as sensing platforms, but as the central system architecture for advancing mobile phenotyping toward autonomous, fine-grained, and field-deployable operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: