Investigations reveal structural and kinetic properties of a ruthenium complex-pyrene dyad, suggesting design insights for future applications.
Herein, we thoroughly investigate the (photo)physical properties and the geometry of the first reported Coulombic dyad, composed of dicationic tris(1,10-phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) and tetraanionic 1,3,6,8-pyrenetetrasulfonate. The mixed dynamic and static quenching behavior of the photoexcited ruthenium complex by the pyrene derivative in water was investigated by time-resolved (laser flash photolysis as well as time-correlated single photon counting) and steady-state emission spectroscopy, highlighting their differences and the importance of accurate models to determine the association constant. Temperature-dependent measurements revealed a decrease in dynamic and static quenching efficiency at elevated temperatures and provided the enthalpy and entropy of ion-pair formation in water. The time constant for intra-ion-pair Dexter energy transfer from the triplet excited state of the metal complex to the organic chromophore was determined to be ∼87 ps using femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Structural insights were obtained from single-crystal X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations revealed a high persistence of the ion-pair in the ground-state and a dynamic yet geometrically well-defined association. A structural similarity was found between solution and solid-state arrangements, indicating π-interactions besides Coulombic interactions between the ions. These interactions enable sufficient orbital overlap, rationalizing the observed efficient Dexter energy transfer, which is as fast as in many covalently linked donor−acceptor systems. These in-depth investigations provide a comprehensive picture of structure–property relationships in Coulombic dyads, offering valuable insights for their future design and applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: