This article explores extraction constraints impacting political order durability, suggesting simplified connections among theories.
Several distinct literatures explain why extractive political orders persist: stationary bandit theory, fiscal-contract accounts, public-goods theory, resilience scholarship, selectorate theory, and the comparative-politics literature on regime durability. Each uses domain-specific assumptions. This article proposes a setup in which four stan-dard microeconomic properties — convex marginal cost of extraction, concave and bounded marginal utility of extractor return for producers, an equilibrium tendency toward zero net extraction, and an exogenous vector of distributed structural constraints — are consistent with the central patterns of all these traditions without their domain-specific additional assumptions. A graphical account shows that stress buffers, which Olson’s framework does not explain, arise as a structural byproduct of distributed constraint: the extractor limited by distributed costs stops far from the producer’s breaking point; the extractor limited only by producer resistance sits at the edge. The contribution is parsimony, not discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Роман Петров (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: