PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026CancersOpen Access

Comparing Response Evaluation Methods for PRRT in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insights from an Exploratory Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PGPriscilla GuglielmoCCCarlo CarnaghiABAlexia Bertuzzi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Exploratory study compares imaging response assessment methods after PRRT in NET patients, suggesting implications for clinical outcomes.

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare imaging-based methods for assessing treatment response in neuroendocrine tumors following PRRT.
  • Conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of NET patients treated with PRRT from 2020 to 2024.
  • Evaluated five imaging response criteria post-PRRT using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.
  • Performed nonparametric statistical analyses to correlate imaging findings with clinical outcomes.
  • Thirty-one patients were evaluated post-PRRT, showing varied response rates across different imaging methods.
  • Functional imaging methods had higher response rates (MORE 66%, Visual PET 68%, ZP 70%) compared to RECIST (40%) and Krenning score (21%).
  • After a median follow-up of 37 months, 58% of patients experienced disease progression with no significant association between imaging responses and progression-free survival.

Cite This Study

Guglielmo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb6540a3ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081267
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share