This review integrates mechanisms of ovarian radiation damage with advanced delivery systems to enhance protection in young women with cancer, suggesting new treatment avenues.
Incidental ovarian irradiation during pelvic radiotherapy or total-body irradiation leads to irreversible endocrine dysfunction, premature ovarian insufficiency, and infertility in young women with cancer. Current clinical strategies-ovarian transposition, shielding, and organ-at-risk dose constraints-provide only partial protection and offer limited control over temporal exposure or spatial confinement. These limitations underscore the need for delivery-enabled radioprotective systems capable of targeting the ovary with precision, synchronizing protection with radiation fractions, and minimizing tumor co-protection.This review integrates the mechanistic foundations of ovarian radiosensitivity with emerging opportunities in drug delivery and biomaterials engineering. We first summarize key biological pathways-including DSB-CHK2/TAp63-mediated oocyte apoptosis, ferroptosis-associated lipid peroxidation (GPX4 loss, 4-HNE accumulation), mitochondrial injury, and microvascular-stromal remodeling-that collectively define the ovarian vulnerability to ionizing radiation and reveal discrete physicochemical intervention windows. Building on this foundation, we evaluate a spectrum of next-generation delivery platforms with direct relevance to ovarian radioprotection: antibody-drug conjugates for ovary-targeted intracellular deposition; lipid nanoparticle-mediated siRNA for transient pathway modulation; ultrasound- or magnetically actuated micro/nanomotors for active tissue penetration and precision positioning; and injectable biodegradable hydrogels for localized, fraction-matched release.We also highlight the emerging "estrogen-anti-ferroptosis axis" as a hypothesis-generating pathway that may synergize with material-enabled strategies to reduce early oxidative and lipid-peroxidative injury. Together, these insights outline a translational roadmap for integrating targeting, controlled release, and bioresponsive materials into radiotherapy workflows, offering new directions for precise, organ-specific protection without compromising oncologic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: