Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows better manufacturing outcomes in patients with fewer prior lines of therapy, implying enhanced efficacy.
Introduction. Cilta-cel is manufactured using autologous T cells, whose quality attributes are the main driver of out-of-specification (OOS) manufacturing results. Previous reports show naive and central memory T cell enrichment correlates with greater in-specification product manufacturing; enrichment is more frequent when patients have fewer prior lines of therapy (pLOTs). Here, we report cilta-cel manufacturing results across multiple pLOTs.Methods. Cilta-cel manufacturing data were analysed to discern manufacturing outcome determinants, define biomarkers predictive of manufacturing success, and assess outcomes following OOS-driven remanufacturing.Results. T cells from patients with fewer pLOTs yielded improved rates of first-time manufacturing success (≥1 pLOT, 93% vs ≥4 pLOTs, 89%; N=~3000). CD3+ cell recovery at manufacturing initiation was less favourable in patients with ≥4 vs fewer pLOTs. The initial cellular CD4:CD8 ratio improved by 54% with fewer pLOTs (average ratio: 1 pLOT, 1.0 vs ≥4 pLOTs, 0.65), indicating a CD4:CD8 ratio >0.5 may contribute to better in-specification, first-time manufacturing. Recovery of viable cells before lentiviral vector transduction and cumulative population doubling level of cells improved up to 7% with relatively fewer pLOTs (P<0.05 for both). Metabolic activity markers were significantly improved with fewer pLOTs (average improvement of 10% with 1 vs more pLOTs). Across OOS outcomes from all pLOTs (n=317), 63% were released through an expanded access program without remanufacturing. Of the remaining 37%, 8.6% were cancelled and 28.6% (n=90) underwent remanufacturing (54 resulted in OOS/cancellation, 36 generated within-specification results). Material from patients with ≥4 pLOTs undergoing remanufacturing led to the same or additional OOS outcomes or cancellations as the first manufacturing OOS outcome (67% attempts, n=36). Remanufacturing from recollection of new material was requested in 14% of initial OOS cases due to insufficient remaining material or concerns about the effect of prior therapies, indicating long-lasting impact of prior treatments and/or disease characteristics. Remanufacturing with new material (n=45) yielded similar/worse outcomes in 31% of cases, with 20% being cancelled. Remanufacturing cancellation and OOS outcome rates with ≥4 pLOTs were 39.5% and 35.5%, respectively (n=29). Manufacturing success rate improved to 99% using cells from ≥1 pLOT patients (6.5% received OOS product) vs 97% for ≥4 pLOTs (9.2% received OOS product).Conclusions. Rates of first and overall manufacturing success were higher, and T cell attributes linked to manufacturing outcomes were improved, when using cells collected from patients with ≥1 vs ≥4 pLOTs. Remanufacture often leads to additional OOS outcomes, further delaying patient treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: