What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to evaluate Article 50(1) of the EU AI Act, focusing on its implications for human-AI interactions and individuals' rights.

Transparency in human-AI interaction – An analysis of Article 50(1) AI Act

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

This analysis critiques Article 50(1) of the AI Act regarding transparency in AI interactions, highlighting regulatory shortcomings.

The aim is to evaluate Article 50(1) of the EU AI Act, focusing on its implications for human-AI interactions and individuals' rights.
Conducted a doctrinal analysis of Article 50(1) of the EU AI Act.
Performed a functional analysis to assess legal structures and limitations.
Critically examined definitions and responsibilities concerning AI system providers and deployers.
Identified significant uncertainties in the definitions of 'direct interaction' and 'obvious' use cases.
Highlighted the inadequate protection for vulnerable groups due to narrow content requirements and lack of effective remedies.
Argued that without reform, Article 50(1) risks being a symbolic measure rather than an effective regulation for human-AI interaction.

Martina J. Block (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark