Study demonstrates self-powered mechanoluminescence monitors blood oxygen saturation, suggesting innovative applications in biomedicine.
Near-infrared mechanoluminescence (NIR ML) materials are gaining attention due to the unique “force-to-photon” conversion ability, offering significant potential for stress sensing, biological imaging, and medical diagnostics. However, current NIR ML materials are facing limitations such as high activation thresholds and poor self-powered emission stability. In this study, we present a self-powered NIR ML material, La 3 Ga 4.9 GeO 14 :0.1Cr 3+ , which exhibits stable emissions under high-temperature heat treatment without requiring external pre-irradiation process. Tuning the Y 3+ /La 3+ ion molar ratio obtained approximately tenfold increased ML intensity, with a low activation threshold ∼1 N. First-principles calculations indicate that Y 3+ substitution induces local lattice distortions, narrowing the bandgap and enhancing carrier mobility (Electron: 193.7 → 485.362 cm 2 V –1 s –1 , Hole: 5.411 → 57.736 cm 2 V –1 s –1 ). This work demonstrates NIR ML technology for non-invasive blood oxygen saturation monitoring based on hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin (Hb/HbO 2 ) absorption differences, providing insights for expanding NIR ML applications in biomedical imaging. • Self-powered broadband near-infrared mechanoluminescence is achieved through the d - d transitions of Cr 3+ ions, without the need for UV light pre-irradiation. • Substituting La 3+ with Y 3+ significantly enhances the near-infrared mechanoluminescence of Cr 3+ ions, with an increase to approximately 10 times the initial intensity. • The increase in carrier mobility (electrons: 193.7→485.36 cm 2 V –1 s –1 , holes: 5.411→57.736 cm 2 V –1 s –1 ) is the fundamental source of mechanoluminescence enhancement. • A non-invasive blood oxygen saturation monitoring method based on near-infrared mechanoluminescence spectroscopy is proposed, demonstrating its potential application value in biomedical fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: