This systematic review examines automation's effects on driver behavior and road suitability, indicating a need for improved integration.
• Rapid vehicle automation is outpacing road upgrades, making integration difficult. • This review examines the impact of automation on driver behaviour and road suitability. • Results show deterioration in driver behaviour: slower decisions, longer tasks and more variability. • Knowledge gaps remain on the impact of automation on merging, weaving and overtaking. • Analysis suggests detailed methods, diverse demographics and robust validation. Vehicle automation technology is advancing faster than our road system can adapt. It is vital to integrate automated vehicles effectively while ensuring drivers can safely and efficiently perform driving tasks when required. This systematic review examines vehicle automation’s impact on driver behaviour and performance with respect to the suitability of existing roads. Focusing on guidance tasks influenced by road geometry and traffic, the review screens 1569 studies; forty met eligibility criteria. The results reveal a significant deterioration in driver behaviour and performance during guidance tasks, characterized by protracted decision-making and reaction times, longer durations for guidance tasks, and increased variability in gaze movement, lateral displacement, and longitudinal and traversal kinematic parameters. While some technological solutions have been suggested to alleviate these declines, the need for more research into how road design affects driver behaviour in automated settings remains evident. A key finding is the limited evidence on both road geometric variables and traffic-related factors; the latter appears more often but remains limited and heterogeneously reported. Significant gaps in knowledge persist regarding automation’s impact on driving guidance in merging, diverging, weaving, and overtaking scenarios, especially on two-lane roads, requiring further study. Additionally, there are gaps related to environmental factors in the context of automation’s impact on guidance tasks and coverage of older drivers and interactions with pedestrians/cyclists and heavy vehicles (including professional drivers) were limited or absent. These points identify the most critical gaps and outline concrete directions for future work on road suitability under assisted and partially/conditionally automated driving.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: