Abstract Background The prevalence of obesity is a global health challenge, as obesity is associated with various comorbidities, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Providing effective treatment to improve health and quality of life for people with obesity is a major health care concern. Internet-delivered treatment (IDT) is an alternative treatment that increases patient accessibility and reachability; however, pilot testing is required before such interventions are evaluated in full-scale studies or implemented. Objective This study aims to investigate the feasibility and user-friendliness of an IDT program for obesity (IDT-O); to evaluate body weight, dietary habits, physical activity, psychosocial functioning, and experiences of treatment in those who completed the 6-month treatment; and to investigate the dropouts’ experiences of the treatment. Methods A prospective 1-year observational approach, evaluated through a multimethod research design, was adopted. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2 , or BMI of 28‐29.9 kg/m 2 with obesity-related comorbidity. Participants were offered a 6-month therapist-assisted IDT-O program providing evidence-based obesity treatment, behavioral and lifestyle support, and strategies to address weight stigma. BMI, participants’ dietary habits, self-reported physical activity, psychosocial functioning, experiences of treatment effects, and treatment satisfaction were measured before treatment and after 6 and 12 months. Dropouts were followed up through qualitative interviews. Results A total of 20 participants (17 females and 3 male; mean age 44.2, SD 16.4 years) started the IDT-O program, and 35% (7/20) completed all 12 modules. Ten (8 females) out of 13 dropouts were interviewed. Both quantitative and qualitative findings showed that participants were generally satisfied with the content and design of the intervention. Those who completed the IDT-O lost some weight (mean 2.0%, 95% CI −1.09 to 5.13), reported improved dietary habits (effect size ES 0.25, 95% CI −0.51 to 1.00), increased physical activity (ES 0.93, 95% CI −0.08 to 1.87), and improved psychosocial functioning (distress: ES 0.43, 95% CI 0.‐0.37 to 1.19; avoidance: ES 0.67, 95% CI −0.18 to 1.48), 6 months after completing the treatment. The qualitative analysis of the interviews revealed “The programme was OK, but it does not suit everyone” as the main theme. The main themes were based on the 3 subthemes: “It wasn’t for me,” “There were good things,” and “There are things to improve.” Conclusions The findings indicate that the IDT-O holds potential as a treatment for people with obesity, although one limitation is that only 35% (7/20) of the participants completed the pilot program. Improvements in lifestyle habits and psychosocial functioning were observed in those who completed the IDT-O, but these findings are preliminary and need to be confirmed in a more comprehensive study. The issue of nonadherence underscores the importance of both thoroughly assessing patients before treatment and further development of IDT-O programs.
Anderzén-Carlsson et al. (Fri,) studied this question.