Analysis reveals wage disparities in forestry occupations, suggesting need for specialized wage framework.
This study investigates the structural misalignment between official wage benchmarks and actual market wages in the Republic of Korea to establish an independent, forestry-specific wage system essential for labor sustainability. Historically, the Republic of Korea forestry project costs have relied on construction industry benchmarks, leading to a “diverging hypothesis” where official rates fail to reflect the specialized risks and technical skills required in forest operations. To address this, a comprehensive wage survey was conducted in 2025 across 13 specialized forestry occupations. Utilizing a sampling frame of 7555 sites, 1044 units were selected via stratified sampling with square-root proportional allocation, ensuring a relative standard error (RSE) of 2.5%. The findings reveal that market wages consistently exceed construction benchmarks by 4.5% to 41.0%. The most significant disparities were observed in leadership and mechanized roles, reflecting substantial “risk–responsibility” and “skill premiums”. Furthermore, the study identifies a structural shift toward risk-transfer strategies, such as stumpage sales, in response to the Serious Accidents Punishment Act (SAPA). These results underscore the urgent need for a specialized wage framework to ensure safety and long-term resilience. Ultimately, such institutional refinement is a prerequisite for securing the high-quality human capital necessary for a sustainable circular bioeconomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung-Min Choi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: