Investigates distribution equality between random and biased samples, suggesting new analytical methods.
This study investigates the problem of testing the equality of two population distributions when one sample is obtained through independent random sampling and the other through a design-based biased mechanism. Motivating examples, such as tree diameter data from forest inventory, highlight the practical relevance of this setting. To address the challenge, we develop a graphical diagnostic tool and formal hypothesis tests within the framework of weighted distributions. A Monte Carlo simulation study is used to assess the performance of the proposed methods in terms of size control and power. Finally, the methodology is demonstrated on diameter-at-breast-height data from the Pertouli Forest (Greece), using random and size-biased samples from hybrid fir to validate the method under a known common population, and a further comparison with a random black pine sample to illustrate its behavior when population equivalence is known not to hold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batsidis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: