PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026TESOL Quarterly1 citations

Teaching for Intelligibility

View Full Paper
DCDustin Crowther

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how intelligibility over nativelikeness has been empirically supported in L2 pronunciation teaching.
  • Review of three dimensions of L2 speech: intelligibility, comprehensibility, accentedness.
  • Analysis of methodological approaches assessing independence among the three dimensions.
  • Discussion of empirical findings and implications for pedagogical practices.
  • Intelligibility is crucial for effective communication in L2 pronunciation.
  • Comprehensibility and accentedness also play significant roles in understanding speech.
  • More dialogue is needed between researchers and teachers to improve L2 pronunciation teaching.

Abstract

Abstract In 2005, TESOL Quarterly published John Levis's highly influential paper “Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching.” As part of TESOL Quarterly's 60th anniversary issue, I review the extent to which Levis's advocacy for intelligibility over nativelikeness in second language (L2) pronunciation learning and teaching has been addressed empirically and implemented pedagogically. I begin with a review of three key global dimensions of L2 speech, mainly intelligibility (i.e., accuracy of understanding), comprehensibility (i.e., ease of understanding), and accentedness (i.e., nativelikeness), and their influential role in L2 pronunciation research. I next consider the methodological approaches used to investigate these three dimensions, specifically in reference to (a) the degree to which they are independent of each other, and (b) the measures of the speech stream to which listeners attend to when asked to assess each. Drawing on relevant empirical findings, I then discuss the claimed pedagogical implications of such research in light of their practicality of implementation by teachers. Finally, I highlight several areas of interest for future research into intelligibility‐oriented L2 teaching, including the need for increased researcher–teacher dialogue, more longitudinal inquiry, and refinement of technology use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dustin Crowther (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47282010ef96374d8e798https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The relationship between intelligibility and comprehensibility in second language speech2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2ACCENT, INTELLIGIBILITY, AND COMPREHENSIBILITY1997 · 890 citations
  3. 3Comparing L2 intelligibility for learners of French: Automatic speech recognition versus human listeners2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Second language speech comprehensibility2022 · 20 citations
  5. 5LINGUISTIC DIMENSIONS OF L2 ACCENTEDNESS AND COMPREHENSIBILITY VARY ACROSS SPEAKING TASKS2017 · 80 citations