Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores how conservationists shaped public opinion using propaganda, indicating the tension between expertise and democracy.
Over the last decades, the history of the conservation movements in Australia, Canada and New Zealand has portrayed them as elitist and scientific movements. This article sheds new light upon these movements by investigating how scientific foresters and conservationists, influenced by new notions of the political sway of the public, devoted significant attention to influence public opinion through propaganda, believing public support essential to the implementation of scientific forestry in a democracy. As this article shows, conservationists and state forest agencies published pamphlets, launched magazines, delivered lectures, and organised exhibitions, seeking to shape public opinion. However, witnessing how the depression threatened to curtail their long work, some conservationists abandoned the idea of the possibility of enacting far-reaching conservation policies under democratic governance, instead advocating for bestowing experts with dictatorial powers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anton Sveding (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: