This review examines social and cultural barriers affecting acute stroke care in low- and middle-income countries, indicating the need for comprehensive strategies.
Stroke is a leading cause of neurological disability and mortality worldwide, with acute ischemic strokes caused by large-vessel occlusions presenting significant health care challenges. While endovascular thrombectomy has emerged as a gold standard treatment, access to timely stroke care remains severely limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review examines the multifaceted social, cultural, and systemic barriers that impede effective stroke care globally. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed from 2004 to 2024, using keywords of acute stroke care, low-middle-income countries, social barriers, cultural barriers, and access. There are several recognized obstacles to stroke treatment, especially in the acute settings, including health fatalism, spiritual and religious beliefs that discourage medical intervention, and widespread lack of public awareness about stroke symptoms and urgency. Cultural misconceptions often lead individuals to delay or avoid seeking medical care, with some communities attributing stroke to supernatural forces or divine punishment. Language barriers, insufficient health care infrastructure, and socioeconomic challenges further compound these issues, particularly in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia. Furthermore, there are critical infrastructural barriers to delivering acute stroke in a timely manner, including limited transportation to health care facilities and inadequate stroke centers in rural areas. A comprehensive strategy to address these challenges should focus on culturally sensitive education, community engagement, and infrastructure development. Recommendations include cooperating with religious and community leaders, developing targeted awareness campaigns, and creating inclusive health care approaches that respect local cultural contexts. Overall, addressing the global stroke burden not only requires technological interventions but also demands a holistic approach that bridges cultural understanding, challenges misconceptions, and empowers communities to recognize and respond to stroke as a critical medical emergency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Mufti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: