Quasi-experimental study shows improved decision-making competence in primary school students, indicating effective teaching methods.
Contemporary education increasingly emphasises transferable competencies that enable learners to analyse situations, evaluate information, and make responsible decisions. This study examined the effects of a structured educational intervention based on inquiry, problem-solving, and role-play activities on the development of decision-making competence in primary school students. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design with a control group was employed. The initial sample consisted of 64 second-grade students, with final analyses conducted on 39 complete cases. Decision-making competence was assessed using a researcher-developed multidimensional scale encompassing six dimensions: identification of alternatives, justification of decisions, anticipation of consequences, autonomy, collaboration, and responsibility. The results indicated a significant improvement in decision-making competence from pre-test (M = 13.23, SD = 1.68) to post-test (M = 20.05, SD = 4.49), t(38) = 8.45, p < 0.001, d = 1.35. Additionally, analysis of covariance revealed a significant effect of group on post-test scores, F(1, 36) = 9.82, p = 0.003, ηp2 = 0.21, with the experimental group demonstrating greater improvement than the control group. A 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA further indicated that gains were more pronounced in the cognitive domain than in the socio-emotional domain. These findings suggest that structured classroom activities involving inquiry, problem-solving, and role-play can support primary school students’ ability to analyse situations, generate alternatives, and justify decisions, particularly within the cognitive dimensions of decision-making competence. At the same time, the more moderate gains observed in collaboration and responsibility highlight the need for sustained, interaction-based learning contexts to support the development of socio-emotional dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monica Maier (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: