PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026International Journal of Diabetes and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Intermittent Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring as a Useful Tool for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Developing Countries

View Full Paper
BEBasma Z. ElmorsyHGHossam Arafa GhaziANAmira Nowara

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficiency of intermittent flash glucose monitoring in improving glycemic outcomes and preventing acute complications in Type 1 Diabetes patients in developing countries.
  • 90 participants with Type 1 Diabetes randomized into three subgroups
  • Group I used self-monitoring of blood glucose only
  • Group II used flash glucose monitoring every 14 days
  • Group III alternated between FGM and SMBG every 4 weeks
  • Assessment of HbA1c, DKA episodes, severe hypoglycemia, and time in range.
  • Group I had significantly higher HbA1c compared to Groups II and III
  • No DKA episodes were reported in Groups II and III, while Group I had three
  • Time in range was significantly higher in Group II than Group III
  • Group I had 12 severe hypoglycemia cases, while Groups II and III had 0 and 3, respectively.

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: The cost of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been the principal barrier to treating type 1 diabetes (T1D) in developing nations; this study evaluates the efficiency of an intermittent scanning regimen on improving glycemic outcomes and preventing acute diabetic complications. Subjects and Methods: A total of 90 participants with a history of T1D over 2-year duration were randomized into three equal subgroups: Group I utilized self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) only for 90 days, Group II used FGM replaced every 14 days, and Group III alternated between FGM for 2 weeks and SMBG for 4 weeks, followed by another 2 weeks of FGM and 4 weeks of SMBG. Comparison of baseline and 3-month glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values was made. In addition, we monitored patients for episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), severe hypoglycemia, and nocturnal hypoglycemia. Furthermore, we evaluated time in range (TIR) between Groups II and III. Results: Group 1 revealed significantly elevated HbA1c compared with Groups II and III. There were three DKA episodes in Group I and none in Groups II and III. The TIR was found to be considerably higher in Group II than in Group III. Regarding severe hypoglycemia, the number of affected patients was 12 (Group I), 0 (Group II), and 3 (Group III). Conclusions: The use of intermittent FGM represents a viable, cost-effective strategy for patients unable to afford continuous FGM. This regimen effectively improves glycemic control (evidenced by reduced HbA1c and complications) and offers substantial protection against acute diabetic complications compared to SMBG alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elmorsy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4734c010ef96374d8f302https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdt.ijdt_43_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper