This presentation analyzes polyvocality in digital heritage, illustrating its complexities in differing historical contexts.
Polyvocality, often celebrated in (digital) heritage as a marker of inclusivity, plurality, and ethical representation, is frequently treated as a universal theoretical ideal. Yet the practical realities of postcolonial memory work reveal that polyvocality is not a stable or uniform concept. This presentation uses findings from the PICCH (Polyvocal Interpretations of Contested Colonial Heritage) project to demonstrate how instead, it is deeply position-dependent, shaped by whether it is enacted within a former colonising nation or a formerly colonised one. This contribution examines two contrasting contexts: (1) a physical historical exhibition in Paramaribo and its digital historical counterpart, and (2) the exhibition ‘Our colonial heritage’ at the Dutch World museum. Through a comparative, multimodal analysis, I argue that polyvocality in (digital) colonial heritage is not simply a matter of representation, but deeply infrastructural, political, and shaped by asymmetrical historical relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorella Viola (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: