Key result
High-intensity staffing with dedicated cardiac intensivists is linked to ~47% lower CICU mortality.
Why the study?
Limited data are available on the role of a cardiac intensivist in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) despite known benefits of dedicated ICU physician staffing in general ICUs.
Does a high-intensity staffing model managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist reduce mortality in adult patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit?
Cohort (n=2,431)
No
Does a high-intensity staffing model managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist reduce mortality in adult patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit?
Odds Ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.32–0.86)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 7.5%
p-value: p=0.010
Implementation of a high-intensity staffing model with a dedicated cardiac intensivist is associated with significantly reduced mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.
Hypothesis-generating for high-intensity cardiac intensivist CICU staffing; leaves open causality and requires RCTs before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Dedicated intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing is associated with a reduction in ICU mortality rates in general medical and surgical ICUs. However, limited data are available on the role of a cardiac intensivist in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association of cardiac intensivist-directed care with clinical outcomes in adult patients admitted to the CICU. METHODS: This study analyzed 2,431 patients admitted to the CICU at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, from January 2012 to December 2015. In January 2013 the CICU was changed from a low-intensity staffing model to a high-intensity staffing model managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist. Eligible patients were divided into either a low-intensity management group (n = 616) or a high-intensity management group (n = 1,815). One-to-many (1:N) propensity score matching with variable matching ratios was also performed. The primary outcome was death in the CICU. RESULTS: Death in the CICU occurred in 55 patients (8.9%) in the low-intensity group versus 74 patients (4.1%) in the high-intensity group (p < 0.001). Of 135 patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the CICU mortality rate in the high-intensity group was also lower than that in the low-intensity group (54.5% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.001). On propensity score matching, high-intensity staffing was found associated with a lower CICU mortality rate in the matched cohort of patients (7.5% vs. 3.7%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.32 to 0.86; p = 0.010). In overall and propensity-matched patients, there were no substantive differences in either median length of CICU stay or readmission rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a dedicated cardiac intensivist was associated with a reduction in CICU mortality rates in patients with cardiovascular disease who required critical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Na et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease requiring critical care (n=2,431). High-intensity staffing model (dedicated cardiac intensivist) vs. Low-intensity staffing model was evaluated on Death in the CICU (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.86, p=0.010). A high-intensity staffing model managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist was associated with lower CICU mortality compared to low-intensity staffing (3.7% vs 7.5%; adjusted OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: