Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates differential antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, suggesting the effectiveness of plant parts.
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized via plant-mediated approaches offer eco-friendly alternatives to conventional antimicrobial agents; however, comparative studies on different plant parts remain limited. In this study, AgNPs were synthesized using aqueous extracts of Catharanthus roseus leaves and stems. Extracts were prepared by boiling 10 g of dried plant material in 100 mL of distilled water, followed by reaction with 1 mM AgNO₃ and incubation for 24 h in the dark. Nanoparticle formation was preliminarily confirmed by visual color change, indicating the reduction of Ag⁺ ions; advanced physicochemical characterization was not performed, and thus the findings represent a preliminary screening study. Antibacterial activity was assessed using the disk diffusion method against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Salmonella abony) bacteria. Leaf-derived AgNPs exhibited higher antibacterial activity, with a maximum inhibition zone of 16.3 ± 0.7 mm against B. subtilis, compared to 14.5 ± 0.6 mm for stem-derived AgNPs. Gram-negative bacteria showed lower susceptibility, with inhibition zones ≤ 12 mm. These results indicate plant-part-dependent variation in antibacterial activity. However, further studies involving physicochemical characterization, MIC/MBC assays, and phytochemical profiling are necessary to validate and extend these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamilselvi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: