This review highlights ammonia's potential as a carbon-free fuel for internal combustion engines, indicating significant emissions reductions and performance improvements.
The urgent drive to decarbonize the transportation sector has positioned ammonia as a carbon-free fuel with high potential in dual-fuel and enrichment strategies for internal combustion engines (ICE). This review consolidates recent findings on ammonia–diesel/biodiesel, ammonia–gasoline, and ammonia–hydrogen blends, with a focus on their performance, emissions, and safety implications. In compression-ignition (CI) engines, partial ammonia substitution in the range of 10–40% ammonia energy share (AES) increases in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate by 5–15%, improves brake thermal efficiency (BTE) by 4–12%, and reduces brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) by 5–10%. Carbon-based emissions are substantially reduced, with CO2 decreases of up to 80%, CO reductions approaching 98%, and HC reductions of up to 80%, although NOx emissions exhibit wide variability. In spark-ignition (SI) engines, ammonia–gasoline blends yield modest BTE gains (≤20–30% ammonia energy ratio, AER) but higher BSFC, while reducing CO2 by up to 60%, CO by up to 50%, and HC by up to 90%. Challenges remain with unburned NH3 slip and elevated NOx. Hydrogen and oxygen enrichment enhance reactivity, with small H2 fractions (≤5%) markedly improving ignition stability and O2 enrichment up to 25% increasing flame velocity by 2.5 times and BTE by ∼3%, albeit with higher NOx emissions. Safety considerations─ammonia toxicity, hydrogen flammability, material embrittlement, and high-pressure operation─necessitate robust mitigation strategies, including advanced leak detection, resilient materials, optimized injection strategies, and aftertreatment systems (selective catalytic reduction (SCR), oxidation catalysts, plasma reactors). With appropriate controls and design innovations, ammonia and its blends can enable efficient, stable, and low-carbon propulsion, contributing to the decarbonization of sustainable transportation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: