The paper demonstrates positivity in Hankel determinants related to the Riemann Hypothesis, suggesting crucial links in mathematical frameworks.
This paper provides a unified view of three major contemporary approaches to the Riemann Hypothesis (RH): the thermal evolution of De Bruijn–Newman, the integrable dynamics of the Toda lattice, and Connes' noncommutative geometry. We show how the RH translates into positivity of the Hankel determinants associated with the Xi function and how this positivity is linked to Jacobi matrices and a Lax flow. We identify three central barriers that remain open: the absence of a well-defined convergent invariant, the impossibility of propagating positivity without assuming the conclusion, and the lack of a proof of total positivity (PF_infinity) for the kernel Phi(u). For the first barrier, we propose a regularized relative invariant and test it numerically with arbitrary-precision arithmetic (250 decimal digits, Jacobi coefficients up to n=29, thermal parameter t in [0,10]). Our computations confirm the strict positivity of all Hankel determinants and Jacobi coefficients at t=0 for n up to 30, consistent with the RH. However, the proposed relative invariant is not conserved along the flow. We test three candidate conservation laws: the relative invariant I_rel(t), the Fredholm determinant det(I + K_t), and the spectral zeta determinant ratio. All three are not conserved. The Fredholm logarithm grows linearly with truncation size N (per-site rate ~5.9×10⁻³), while the spectral zeta ratio grows sublinearly (~N^0.53), suggesting that zeta regularization may partially cancel the extensive contribution. A systematic study of the spectral zeta difference D(s,N) as a function of s reveals a two-regime structure: the growth exponent alpha(s) follows alpha ≈ s for s ≥ 1 but saturates at alpha ≈ 0.49 for s → 0. A sliding window analysis identifies the asymptotic growth as A√N·ln(N) + B√N + C (R² > 0.99999), with the dip at s ≈ 0.33 arising from partial cancellation between sub-leading terms. On the analytic side, we prove that the operator difference K_t = L(t) − L(t_ref) does not belong to any Schatten class S_p (p ≥ 1), eliminating the entire family of generalized Fredholm determinants and establishing spectral zeta regularization as the only viable approach. We also discover a thermal factorization: D(s,N,t) ≈ (t_ref − t) · F(s,N), where the spectral profile F(s,N) is independent of t to within 0.3% over 9 values of t spanning [0,10] (including t > t_ref). This identifies F(s,N)/(√N·ln N) as a candidate t-independent spectral functional, connecting the Toda framework to Connes' noncommutative geometry via the Dixmier trace. All sensitivity analyses over t_ref confirm that results are robust. The Python code for all numerical experiments is available as supplementary material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastião de Abreu Cavalcante (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: