Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates breast ultrasound classification accuracy in patients, suggesting the need for strict validation methods.
This study presents a leakage-aware benchmark of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), and a CNN–transformer late-fusion configuration for benign-versus-malignant breast ultrasound classification on the BUS-UCLM dataset. After exclusion of normal-category images, the final cohort comprised 264 images from 36 patients, including 174 benign and 90 malignant images. Seven CNN-family models, one ViT baseline, and one ResNet18–ViT probability-level late-fusion configuration were evaluated using strict patient-level five-fold cross-validation. Additional analyses included fusion ablation, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank testing, Grad-CAM visualisation, and an image-level leakage demonstration. Under strict patient-level evaluation, performance was moderate across all models. GoogLeNet achieved the highest mean accuracy (61.48%), InceptionV3 achieved the highest mean Macro-F1 (59.24%), and ResNet50 achieved the highest mean AUC (0.6699), whereas the standalone ViT showed weaker overall discrimination. The late-fusion configuration remained competitive in threshold-dependent metrics but did not surpass the strongest CNN baselines in AUC. Overall, no architecture demonstrated a clear advantage across both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent metrics. By contrast, image-level splitting substantially inflated apparent performance, underscoring the importance of rigorous patient-level separation for credible benchmarking in breast ultrasound classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lulu Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: