Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework demonstrates collision-free motion planning in narrow passages, suggesting enhanced robotic navigation safety.
• Clearance-aware GNN encodes link-obstacle distances as edge features • Transformer decoder generates variable-length collision-free waypoints • Three-tier evaluation decomposes neural, refinement, and fallback roles • Largest gains (+7.4pp) on tightest passages with clearance below • 04m • Real-robot validation: 81.7 Planning collision-free motions for articulated manipulators in narrow passages remains challenging: classical samplers require many iterations to resolve tight geometric constraints, while learning-based planners operating on raw point clouds lack explicit reasoning about link–obstacle clearances. We present DeepPathNet, a planning framework that constructs a configuration-dependent heterogeneous scene graph encoding robot link keypoints and obstacle primitives as nodes, with edge-level clearance features capturing signed distances and surface normals between each link–obstacle pair. A clearance-aware graph neural network propagates these geometric signals through message passing, and a Transformer decoder autoregressively generates variable-length waypoint sequences. A collision-aware refinement module ensures safety via L-BFGS smoothing, exact collision checking, local repair, and classical fallback. We propose a three-tier evaluation protocol (Raw / Refined / Full) that transparently decomposes system contributions. Experiments on MotionBenchMaker with Franka Panda (7-DoF) and UR5 (6-DoF) show that DeepPathNet achieves 91.2% success on in-distribution scenes and 78.5% on narrow passages, with statistically significant improvements over MPiNets ( p < 0.05) and the largest gains on the tightest gaps ( + 7.4 percentage points for clearance < 0.04 m). Ablation studies, cross-robot transfer, noise robustness, and simulation-based scenario experiments (5 scenario types, 120 trials) validate the approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: