A framework forecasts earthquake fatalities using prior data, improving response strategies after disasters.
We present a framework for accurately forecasting a class of nondecreasing temporal count processes with a finite limit. Specifically, we apply this framework to rapidly estimate total earthquake-induced fatalities. We model trends in successive reported fatality counts by public media within the first hours and days after a major earthquake, using an updated Bayesian framework to forecast the likely final count. This work extends previous research with several key improvements: (1) Addressing past earthquake fatality trends that deviated significantly from the previous framework's assumptions; (2) Leveraging reported fatality data from past earthquakes to improve projections for new events; and (3) Optimizing and scaling the observed data's influence to enhance estimates and associated uncertainty. We demonstrate the predictive capabilities of this high- dimensional framework by comparing its performance to its predecessor across several past deadly earthquakes, including the 2023 M 7.8 Türkiye/Syria earthquake sequence. We show that the proposed high-dimensional updating framework improves forecasting and significantly reduces overall uncertainties compared to PAGER's initial estimates. MSC 2010 subject classifications: Primary 60K35, 60K35; secondary 60K35. • The manuscript presents a novel framework for accurately forecasting earthquake-induced fatalities using prior loss models and reported fatality data from news media outlets. • The rapid assessment of likely impact within the first hours and days after a major earthquake is critical for post-earthquake response. • The proposed framework can be adapted for forecasting impacts from other disasters using ground truth reports and helps to enhance our ability to effectively respond to natural disasters worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: