Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study examines cement remnants in implant-supported restorations, suggesting tailored retention mechanisms.
RMGIC resulted in higher residue areas than RC. Within the limitations of this study, cement remnants appear to be unavoidable through standard clinical procedures, emphasizing the need for case-specific choice of the retention mechanism for ISRs. Screw-retained ISRs present a viable alternative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vindasiutė-Narbute et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: