THE INFINITE STRUCTURE OF THE COSMOS: A critical-propositional reading of the article The Infinite Universe Framework (IUF): An Infinite, Non-Expanding Cosmos Grounded in Physical Law and Photon Energy Transfer, by Jordan Glazier, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Jordan Glazier’s preprint The Infinite Universe Framework (IUF): An Infinite, Non-Expanding Cosmos Grounded in Physical Law and Photon Energy Transfer in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study evaluates the conceptual architecture of the IUF, with special attention to its two main components—the Physical Universe Theory (PUT) and the Cumulative Photon Energy Transfer (C-PET) model—as well as its reinterpretation of the cosmic microwave background through the Photon–Medium Microwave Thermal Field (PMMTF) hypothesis. The article investigates possible compatibilities and major points of tension between Glazier’s framework and the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity. In particular, it examines the manuscript in light of the Seven Absolute Truths of TO, the cosmogonic theorem, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis argues that Glazier’s proposal is significant as an alternative cosmological program because it rejects singular cosmic origin, emphasizes structured physical interactions, and seeks observational falsifiability. At the same time, it concludes that the IUF remains insufficient from the standpoint of TO because it does not derive the cosmos from a modal-logical foundation, does not adequately distinguish infinity as a necessary non-element, does not formulate a rigorous ontology of boundaries, and does not explicitly recognize the transcendent substance as the informational-radiative surplus produced in atomic relations. The article therefore positions the IUF as a valuable dialogical interlocutor for the Theory of Objectivity, especially in the critique of singularist cosmology, while also arguing that it does not yet attain the modal ontological depth required by TO. The text also seeks to contribute to broader debates in cosmology, ontology, and philosophy of physics by proposing a disciplined comparison between alternative cosmological models and a modal theory of objective genesis. Note: This analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT.