Evaluates a multiclass model for detecting foliar diseases in barley, suggesting improved accuracy and efficiency.
Background Accurate segmentation of foliar diseases under field conditions is essential for large-scale phenotyping, as breeding programs rely on reliable severity estimates to identify genotypes with improved resistance. However, most deep learning approaches have been developed as pathogen-specific models, which limits scalability in field-grown barley where multiple diseases naturally co-occur and exhibit substantial visual similarity. Results We evaluated whether a multiclass segmentation model can simultaneously detect and distinguish two fungal diseases of barley, Puccinia hordei and Ramularia collo-cygni , and compared its performance with two disease-specific binary models. Using 336 high-resolution leaf scans collected in the field with naturally occurring co-infections, the multiclass model achieved higher Dice scores for brown rust (0.59 vs 0.40; +47.5% relative improvement) and ramularia (0.60 vs 0.53; +13.2% relative improvement). It also captured a greater proportion of individual lesions across both classes. At the genotype level, the model-predicted disease area percentages were highly consistent with those from ground truth annotations ( $$r > 0.99$$ ). Conclusions A unified multiclass framework can more effectively segment visually similar foliar diseases than separate binary models, while simplifying the computational workflow. This provides a scalable basis for automated resistance assessment within breeding pipelines. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/grimmlab/BarleyDiseaseSegmentation, with Mendeley Data dataset DOI 10.17632/4ny92p2r8f.1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martello et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: