Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the ability of the PRECISE-DAPT, CRUSADE, and DAPT scores to predict major cardiovascular events and bleeding at 1 year after coronary intervention.
Does the PRECISE-DAPT score accurately predict bleeding and major cardiovascular events compared to CRUSADE and DAPT scores in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on dual antiplatelet therapy?
Does the PRECISE-DAPT score accurately predict bleeding and major cardiovascular events compared to CRUSADE and DAPT scores in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on dual antiplatelet therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The PRECISE-DAPT score is superior to CRUSADE and DAPT scores for predicting 1-year bleeding risk after PCI, whereas the DAPT score is better for predicting major cardiovascular events.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thành et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: