Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In-vitro study evaluates biocompatibility of modified aluminum alloy in dental and orthopedic applications, suggesting favorable outcomes.
Although aluminum (Al) alloys are rarely used in orthopedics, their low density and low cost warrant research into their suitability for biocompatible applications. This study compared a typical 354 aluminum alloy with a modified version (M354) containing 0.35 wt% Zr and 0.14 wt% Ni. Both alloys were inspected using optical micrographs. Field Emission Microscopy with Energy-Dispersive X-ray (FE-SEM/EDX) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) were used to analyze the surfaces of both alloys after incubation in simulated body fluid. Furthermore, the alloys were subjected to corrosion tests and in-vitro MTT cytotoxicity and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays. Optical micrographs revealed a more refined grain structure for M354 due to precipitation of Alx(Zr, Ti)Si and Al3Ni containing particles on the grain boundaries. FE-SEM /EDX analysis showed increased calcium content on M354 compared to the 354 alloy following incubation. AFM revealed a higher initial surface roughness for M354, which decreased after incubation, while the roughness of the 354 alloy increased, indicating M354’s strong bioactivity. M354 alloy exhibits a more positive potential than the non-modified 354 version, M354 likewise showed higher cell proliferation. Both alloys exhibited higher ALP activity than the control, indicating that the alloying elements had no adverse effects on cell biocompatibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safwat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: