Determines pharmacokinetic parameters of phylloquinone using a CSII method, suggesting improved precision and reliability.
Introduction: Reported pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly half-life (t1/2), show substantial variability for phylloquinone, due to the limitations of classical pharmacokinetic models. The study aims to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of phylloquinone using a Constant-Speed Intravenous Infusion (CSII) strategy, designed to overcome the limitations of the low terminal-phase concentration quality following Intravenous (IV) bolus administration. Methods: The Sprague-Dawley rats received a constant-rate infusion of phylloquinone for 15 hours. Plasma concentrations were quantified by a validated HPLC method, and pharmacokinetic parameters following CSII were derived by fitting the data to a one-phase exponential association model. Results: Following CSII, phylloquinone exhibited a t1/2 of 4.27 ± 0.47 h, CL of 56.93 ± 9.00 mL/h, and Vd of 321.86 ± 29.25 mL without the limitation of low terminal-phase concentrations. Following IV, the t1/2 and Vd of phylloquinone based on two-compartment analysis were larger than those based on one-compartment analysis. Noncompartmental analysis revealed significant differences in t1/2 and Mean Residence Time (MRT) across varying sampling durations. Meanwhile, the t1/2 of phylloquinone was markedly different from its MRTequated half-life. Additionally, the Vd estimated after CSII was larger than that obtained from the IV bolus. Discussion: The CSII strategy avoids reliance on error-prone terminal-phase data by deriving the pharmacokinetic parameters from the ascending phase of the concentration-time profile. This approach provided robust parameter estimates and helped clarify inconsistencies observed with traditional IV bolus analyses. Conclusion: CSII provides a valuable complementary strategy for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, especially for compounds with problematic terminal-phase analysis or those routinely given by CSII. Its broader applicability warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: