Prospective observational study evaluates sedation agreement in mechanically ventilated children, indicating effective sedation monitoring tools.
Background and aims:The COMFORT B score is a validated method for the assessment of the level of sedation in children, but it has its limitations.The bispectral index (BIS) is an electroencephalogram (EEG)-based tool used to assess the level of consciousness.The primary objective was to evaluate agreement between the BIS and the COMFORT B score for sedation in children on mechanical ventilation (MV).Patients and methods: This prospective, noninterventional study was conducted on 138 patients, aged >6 months, receiving MV in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).COMFORT B score and BIS were taken 30 minutes after initiation or dosage change of sedatives and then once every 8 hours for a maximum of 96 hours.Results: A total of 1,534 datasets were analyzed.Bispectral index values ranged from 11 to 89, while COMFORT B scores were between 6 and 28.The mean [ standard deviation (SD)] value for the BIS and COMFORT B scores was 54.4 13.8 and 14 4, respectively.Adequate sedation was recorded in 82.5 and 79.9% instances with BIS and COMFORT B scores, respectively.The correlation coefficient (r) of BIS and COMFORT B scores was 0.7.Overall agreement (kappa value) between the BIS and COMFORT B score was 0.642.A BIS score of 43 had 93% sensitivity and 70% specificity in differentiating oversedation from adequate sedation (AUROC 0.81).Similarly, a BIS value of 79 distinguished between adequate and undersedation (sensitivity 90%; specificity 98%; AUROC 0.966).The best AUROC (0.777) was observed in children with central nervous system (CNS) diseases, while the worst (0.54) occurred in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Conclusion:The BIS and COMFORT B scores have a good level of agreement in children, except in children with neuromuscular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jhunjhunwala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: