A mechanism-aware model predicts shear strength in FRP-strengthened beams, suggesting improved design reliability.
Shear strengthening of existing reinforced concrete beams via externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) systems is widely practiced; however, accurate prediction of shear capacity remains challenging due to complex interaction mechanisms, regime-dependent failure behavior, and the limited generalization of existing design-code equations. Code-based models calibrated on restricted experimental data often exhibit bias and large scatter across varying geometries, shear span-depth ratios, and FRP layouts, whereas purely data-driven machine-learning approaches typically lack physical interpretability. To address these limitations, a mechanism-aware physics-guided machine-learning framework is proposed for predicting the shear strength of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams. The framework decomposes total shear resistance into a mechanics-based concrete contribution and a data-driven residual component modeled via XGBoost, enabling variance reduction and physically informed learning. A compiled database of 275 experimental beam tests is classified into low \:a/d≤\:2.5 and high \:a/d>2.5 shear span-depth regimes to reflect distinct dominant failure mechanisms. In the high $$\:a/d$$ regime, the model achieves R² = 0.927, RMSE = 19.33 kN, and MAE = 14.58 kN, whereas in the low $$\:a/d$$ regime it attains R² = 0.771, RMSE = 72.67 kN, and MAE = 44.69 kN, consistent with greater mechanism variability. Explainable-AI analyses confirm regime-dependent parameter influence and saturation of FRP effectiveness, demonstrating mechanically coherent and interpretable predictions. Potential applications to reliability-based assessment and design-code calibration require additional uncertainty quantification and external validation beyond the scope of this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: