Rotational loading induces significant wear in glass-ceramics, suggesting insights for improving dental materials.
Background: The wear resistance of modern commercial glass-ceramic materials used in dental prostheses was investigated under cyclic contact conditions that included a rotational component. This loading mode has been largely overlooked in conventional in vitro wear testing, yet may be clinically relevant in patients with parafunctional conditions such as bruxism. Methods: Rotational loading was applied using an all-electric testing machine equipped with a biaxial actuator. Loading cycles combined a normal load (50 N) and a rotation (30°), at a frequency of 1 Hz. Microstructure and damage were characterized using advanced microscopy. Results: Rotational loading induced substantial damage across this class of materials, including the formation of glassy tribolayers with limited protective capability under the low-humidity conditions examined. Significant microstructure-dependent variations in wear volume were observed, with specific wear rates indicating severe wear (SWR above 10−6 mm3/N·m threshold) in three of the five materials tested. Lithium disilicate glass-ceramics, characterized by a high fraction of elongated reinforcement crystals, exhibited the greatest resistance to damage, whereas leucite-based glass-ceramics showed the lowest. The dominant wear mechanisms were plastic-deformation-induced grooving and fracture-driven chipping. The findings are interpreted within established wear models for brittle materials (Archard and fracture-based) and supported by numerical simulations of stress fields across multiple length scales. Implications: The results provide mechanistic insight into rotational wear damage in glass-ceramic systems, a material class particularly susceptible to such loading, and inform strategies for material selection and microstructural design aimed at improving prosthetic durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez-González et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: