A novel model quantifies indoor acoustic comfort using objective metrics in diverse scenarios, indicating significant benefits.
Current indoor acoustic models mainly use sound pressure level cutoffs or occupant surveys, missing an interpretable, multi-factor index that links objective metrics with perceived indoor acoustic conditions. This paper introduces a fuzzy-logic Acoustic Comfort Index (ACI) that integrates six inputs: sound pressure level, dominant frequency, emission pattern, masking condition, acoustic criticality, and noise variability, into a continuous 0–1 score (lower indicating greater comfort) with categorical interpretation. The framework is conceptually informed by the ISO/TS 12913 soundscape paradigm, emphasizing contextual and perceptual aspects without relying on survey-based inputs. A 2025-rule Mamdani system is generated through automated rule construction. Model benchmarking includes 1000 randomized cases and 16 representative indoor scenarios. Local sensitivity analysis quantifies variable influence, while a ridge-regularized GAM surrogate confirms expected monotonic behavior and yields strong hold-out agreement. PCA clustering identifies comfort regimes that support practical diagnostic use. Benchmarking against SPL-only and reduced models illustrates the added value of contextual and perceptual variables. A MATLAB ACI Calculator App enables practical application from direct inputs or audio recordings, with calibrated inputs used for absolute SPL estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Issah M. Alhamad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: