Key result
Genetic variants are identified in ~33% of patients with low HDL-C versus ~5% with high HDL-C.
Why the study?
Does genetic testing using sex-specific HDL-C thresholds improve the identification of pathogenic variants in individuals with extreme HDL-C levels?
Cohort (n=210)
Does genetic testing using sex-specific HDL-C thresholds improve the identification of pathogenic variants in individuals with extreme HDL-C levels?
Absolute Event Rate: 33.3% vs 5.05%
Using sex-specific HDL-C thresholds for genetic testing improves the detection of pathogenic variants in individuals with extreme HDL-C levels compared to uniform thresholds.
Aim This study aimed to assess the prevalence of genetic variants responsible for extreme levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and evaluate the adequacy of current thresholds for genetic testing of HDL-related dyslipidemia. Methods Using data from the Tromsø Study, a population-based cohort in Northern Norway, we identified 210 individuals with HDL-C levels ≤ 0.5 mmol/L or ≥ 3.0 mmol/L. Six HDL-related genes ( ABCA1, APOA1, CETP, LCAT, PLTP, SCARB1 ) were sequenced in these participants. We classified variants according to ACMG guidelines, incorporating functional assays and UK Biobank data for additional phenotype-genotype associations. Results We identified 38 variants of interest across six HDL-related genes, of which 10 were considered potentially causative, found in 14 individuals. Genetic causes were detected in 33.3% of individuals with low HDL-C and 5.05% of those with high HDL-C. Sex-specific analyses showed that using HDL-C thresholds aligned with population distributions improved detection of individuals with pathogenic variants, particularly among women with high HDL-C and men with low HDL-C. These findings suggest that current uniform thresholds may overlook clinically relevant cases and that incorporating sex-specific HDL-C distributions could enhance the identification of individuals with suspected genetic HDL disorders. Conclusions Genetic testing for HDL-related dyslipidemia is underutilized, with many individuals not meeting the current extreme HDL-C threshold criteria. Revised sex-specific thresholds for genetic testing will improve the identification of pathogenic variants and provide more accurate diagnoses of HDL-related disorders. Continued research is essential to refine our understanding of HDL genetics and its clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ølnes et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Extreme levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (n=210). Low HDL-C (≤ 0.5 mmol/L) vs. High HDL-C (≥ 3.0 mmol/L) was evaluated on Detection of potentially causative genetic variants. Potentially causative genetic variants were detected in 33.3% of individuals with low HDL-C and 5.05% of those with high HDL-C, suggesting sex-specific thresholds could improve diagnostic yield.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: