A stated-preference analysis examines transport mode choice in Larissa, suggesting implications for urban mobility.
Under growing urbanization and environmental challenges, sustainable urban mobility has become a critical priority for cities worldwide. Public Transport (PT) systems play a central role in reducing car dependency, lowering emissions, increasing network capacity, and promoting more equitable and efficient access to urban spaces for all users. Hence, the present paper aims to investigate PT preferences in the city of Larissa, Greece. Larissa is a medium-sized city currently serviced only by buses, and is currently focusing on the potential introduction of a new tram system to operate in parallel with existing bus services. To this end, a SP survey was designed and implemented, resulting in 972 observations that were collected for further statistical analysis. Survey results show a slight preference for trams over buses, with 54.63% selecting the tram and 45.37% favoring the buses. Moreover, a context-based segmentation pipeline was established using PCA, DBSCAN and t-SNE algorithms, aiding the visualization of existing clusters for transport choice approaches. Afterwards, a series of mixed logit models was applied, and statistically significant variables influencing mode choice were determined. The study also examines Value of Time (VoT) metrics and finds that respondents assign lower VoTs to trams than to buses, especially in out-of-vehicle segments of the journey, such as waiting and walking, and therefore consider trams as more pleasant and less burdensome. The findings also indicate that passengers place a high value on the quality of infrastructure related to access and waiting times, underlining the need to improve the overall user experience beyond the vehicle itself. In summary, the present research offers valuable insights into how the introduction of a tram system could possibly reshape PT usage patterns when compared with the legacy existing bus services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theofilatos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: