PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World0 citationsOpen Access

The Sociology of “Dirty Research”: Interresearcher Positionality, Marginalization, and Stigma Management

View Full Paper
ESEran Shor

Key Points

  • This paper investigates the concept of dirty research, focusing on interresearcher positionality and stigma management.
  • Theoretical analysis of dirty research and its implications across various scholarly fields.
  • Reflection on personal experiences related to conducting dirty research and its associated challenges.
  • Examination of varying consequences based on intersecting identities and demographics among researchers.
  • Defines dirty research and identifies its core tenets, expanding its scope to include dirty activities and people.
  • Highlights the academic and personal repercussions of conducting dirty research, varying by researcher demographics.
  • Discusses potential stigmatization and marginalization risks encountered by researchers involved in this field.

Abstract

Although social science research has thoroughly reflected on researchers’ positionality vs. their field and informants, interresearcher positionality has been less rigorously explored. The author examines stigma management and positionality surrounding “dirty research.” He develops a theory of “dirty research” that expands the definition of this concept, identifies its core tenets, and reflects on its consequences and perils for a wide range of scholars. This theory examines the fluidity of “dirty work” and, by extension, “dirty research,” suggesting that the latter should also extend to the study of “dirty people” and “dirty activities.” The author also assesses the academic and personal consequences and perils potentially associated with conducting “dirty research” and the ways in which these consequences vary by researchers’ intersecting identities and demographics. The author then reflects on his own positionality and experiences in conducting “dirty research,” noting both his privileged position and the challenges that nevertheless persist. The author ends with thoughts about future directions for scholars who engage in “dirty research” given the serious challenges of stigmatization and marginalization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eran Shor (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865476e0dea528dde9dabhttps://doi.org/10.1177/23780231261440318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Playing with the Politics of Perversion: Policing BDSM, Pornography, and Black Female Sexuality2016 · 33 citations
  2. 2Symbolic boundary work: Jewish and Arab femicide in Israeli Hebrew newspapers2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Sexual(ized) harassment and ethnographic fieldwork: A silenced aspect of social research2016 · 116 citations
  4. 4Racial Microaggressions Against Black Counseling and Counseling Psychology Faculty: A Central Challenge in the Multicultural Counseling Movement2008 · 231 citations
  5. 5Camming2020 · 201 citations