Demonstrates a GenAI framework that enhances sentiment labeling in drug reviews, suggesting improved medication safety monitoring.
The analysis of medical data presents an opportunity for healthcare systems to support decision-making and improve patient outcomes. In this context, the automated analysis of user-generated drug reviews offers a promising approach for monitoring medication safety, understanding patient experiences, and detecting potential adverse effects in real time. This study advances sentiment analyses for pharmacovigilance by introducing a data-centric framework that incorporates a GenAI-powered labeling system for reliable and interpretable data annotation. A corpus of 213,869 user-generated drug reviews was processed through a hybrid labeling pipeline that reconciles user ratings, lexicon-based polarity, zero-shot transformer predictions, and GPT-5.2 as a fallback mechanism. This strategy enables the resolution of sentiment ambiguity, particularly the frequent misalignment between user-assigned ratings and underlying textual sentiment, by leveraging contextual understanding rather than relying solely on numerical scores. Drug review representations are enhanced using the Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B model, allowing improved capture of semantic nuances. Evaluated through 10-fold stratified cross-validation, the proposed labeling framework combined with a Random Forest classifier achieves a classification accuracy of 96.45%, with per-class analysis confirming consistent performance across all sentiment categories. Cross-source validation on an independent drug review dataset of 4091 reviews and a threshold sensitivity analysis further support the robustness and generalizability of the proposed approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vouzis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: